PUBLIC ADVOCACY: We have a future

1. 9/8/13 NY TIMES Gretchen Morgenson Find the Loan, behind the Loans. On line lenders who charge borrowers stratospheric interest rates are coming under pressure from state regulators ..and it’s about time. But to get to the root of the problem, the Regulators will need to dig deeper. Under this system, larger Banks and security firms circumvent the law, by funding dubious payday lenders. Would this system have existed if Glass Steagall was in effect? Would large financial institutions have been legally allowed to enable ” lenders of last resort”, as they provided funding to fuel the sub prime mortgage industry? We have a choice?

2.Just listened to 60 minutes 9/8/13 after watching the unbeatable Serena Williams win her 17 th Tennis Title? An EXTROADINARY athlete, a person, still vital and useful as a human being, but you wouldn’t consider her place in the Brave New World of Robotics, or would you?

Is our world so ” Elysium”, that humans have no place? I don’t think so? I don’t believe we’re living in the best of all possible World’s yet? Do we have the best transportation available for workers or pleasures? Is our infrastructure state of the art? Our health care, so sublime, we have no need of drugs or stem cells? Have we developed alternative fuels? Did we stabilize our financial system? Is our Education so comprehensive we have nothing more to learn? The $64,000 question is why manufacturers feel that the advent of new technology makes human beings superfluous ?

It seems to me that unless and until we make life better for the Humans on this planet, the Technocrats are short sighted. New technology is a tool for people, it should allow the rest of us time to create a better future. The case for human beings and gainful employment demands instant response. Why aren’t more people thinking how to use the Tools of the future to make life better for us on Earth?

We should have a choice, In fact many choices!

3.9/10/13 NY TIMES The lists of money gone astray continues. Farm subsidies for non farmers may continue as Lawmakers Deadlock again. 18,000 people in 24 of the Nation’s largest cities, received $24Million in farm subsidies and they are not actively involved in farming! The program costs the government $5Billion and goes to 2300 farms that grow no crops? These subsidies continue to protect farmers against failing crops which they don’t produce?

Where is the safety net to protect small businesses from the Financial Crisis created by Wall Street. Why couldn’t they get protection and reimbursement from other people’s mistakes? We have a choice.

4. Last night, on my way to The New School, I took the #1 train to 14th Street and was appalled by the decay and grime evident on the platform. On 14th Street a similar scene of dirt and decay was reinforced. That’s when I had my “Eureka Moment.” Why couldn’t we institute “an adopt a Street or a Subway Platform Program”. Big Business, could name their Street or subway platform and pay for it’s maintenance , similar to the signs I’ve seen on the LIE , it’s a thought. The city has much to do, this could be a start to employ many who are out of work. What do you think? We have choices.

19 thoughts on “PUBLIC ADVOCACY: We have a future

  1. Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources back to your site?
    My blog is in the exact same area of interest as yours and my users would definitely benefit
    from a lot of the information you provide here. Please let me know if this alright with you.

    Thank you!

    1. Hi thanks for your support.
      Please send me a link to your Blog. Once I’ve read it, I’ll correspond with you.
      Though I believe all of us with a Common Interest should link together , I’d like to read your Blog first before approving inclusion within it!
      Wishing you the best. Joyce

  2. I do agree with all the concepts you have presented
    on your post. They are really convincing and will definitely work.
    Still, the posts are too quick foor newbies. May you plpease lengthen them a little from subsequent time?
    Thanks for the post.

    1. Hi thanks so much for your comment.
      I have kept the Posts short thinking that’s all people want to absorb.
      I’ll keep your comments and try to expand on subjects of interest.
      All the best. Joyce

  3. This is among the reasons why I keep returning to this web site. This post is an abundance of information and I can’t wait to get started on using them. I love how it is clear that you took a bunch of time and effort in research. I never enjoy it when I read on posts that are 600 words long but are wanting in content. It’s like they just want to catch you in and they’re not really showing something productive. So thank you!

    1. Thanks for support and praise.
      I’ve tried to make the Post’s informative in a short length.bbI’m glad you found them easy to read with ” great” content I’ve been working on the right balance.

      All the best. Joyce

  4. Beautiful portion of material. I just became aware of your web site plus in accession investment to assert that I enter fact loved bill your blog articles. Anyway I shall be opt-in for your feeds as well as I actually results you have admittance to consistently fast.

    1. Hi there:
      Thanks for taking the time to comment in English. Where are you from?
      It gives me great pleasure to know that I am reaching 50 Countries.
      Please continue reading and sharing.
      All the best. Joyce

  5. You are so cool! I do not suppose I have read through something like this before.
    So wonderful to find someone with original thoughts on this subject matter.
    Really.. thanks for starting this up. This web ssite is
    one thing that is required on the internet, someone with
    a bit of originality!

    1. Thanks so much.
      Glad to provide some fresh thoughts to ponder on the Web.
      Please continue to follow me and comment on content.
      All the best. Joyce

Leave a Reply