Public Advocacy: The Economist Inside the banks

It’s our choice: How far have we come since 1/24/09? My notes, from This 14 page special report.

1. Page 6: Animal Spirits; the possible causes of the “great bubble”: Barely legal mortgage underwriters, overpaid Bankers and the intoxication of easy credit. Cupidity, fraud and delusion were part of the big bubble and bust. In the words of Willem Buiter, of The London School of Economics, ” finance is a scary, inherently unstable, essential activity”.

2. Aside: People act irrationally; they buy in an up market and panic in a down market. Everyone loves to participate in a boom, but when investors lose confidence that other people will honor their promises, that undermines the market. Liquidity and credit suddenly become scarce and a devastating value destroying uncertainty takes hold. That characterizes “the bust”.

3. Page 10 Plato’s Cave. Mathematical models are a powerful way of predicting financial markets. But they are fallible.

In 1973 The Chicago Board Options Exchange traded 911 derivative contracts, this was one month before Black-Scholes appeared in print. (For the uninformed, there were 3 partners (Myron Scholes, Robert Merton & Black), from the MIT Sloan School of Management, they explained how to use share prices to calculate derivatives. In 1983 Robert Rubin Hired Fischer Black from MIT. In 1998 Long Term Capital Management was run by John Merriweather and his team from Salmon Brothers along with Merton and Scholes. Their Hedge Fund almost brought down the market when Russia defaulted on it’s loan. Their collapse was the credit crunch in miniature and should have served as a warning going forward.)

In 2007, the CBOE’s volume in contracts reached almost 1 trillion.

4. Page 13 To sum up, the Trillion Dollar bet on mortgages went disastrously wrong. Almost as damaging is the hash the Banks have made of “value at risk” (VAR) calculations, a measure of the potential losses of a portfolio. This is supposed to show, whether banks and other financial outfits are being safely run. Regulators use VAR calculations to work out how much capital banks need to put aside for a rainy day. But the calculations are flawed.

5. page 18 The Uneven Contest: Financial regulation is essential. That does not make it easy. The case for Regulation is financiers make mistakes and everyone else has to pay for them.

6. The Economist postulates: Fixing Finance. The world has a chance to make finance work better. It should tread carefully. It is worth quoting James Tobin (page 22) The advantages of liquidity and negotiability of financial instruments come at a cost of facilitating nth degree speculation which is short sighted and inefficient.

In summary, if you believe this point of view, you may want a core of regulated banks, that cannot blithely create credit, take on leverage or secrete assets off their balance sheets. If hedge funds continue to exist, then limit their access to capital.

The presumption should be for transparency. That favours market based accounting. CDO’s which trade in huge volumes should pass through clearing houses. That would have the added benefit of limiting the damage from a collapse, since the default would pass to the clearing house too. The system can be made more robust in other ways. Senior financiers could take more of their pay in equity; and hand some back if the Bank does badly.

Whatever happens, the choice hinges on the interests of the economy as a whole. After all, it’s taxpayers and savers who pay for financial crises. Centuries of boom and bust have taught us that financial crisis occur, but you can exercise some choice over what kind of crisis you get. (page 21)

8 thoughts on “Public Advocacy: The Economist Inside the banks

    1. Thanks for your comments.
      Too bad, this analysis by The Economist, has not been re-read by those who have the power to reform our financial system. The Economist wrote this article in 2009 and it’s still relevant! 5 years later Banks are still Too Big Too Fail!
      Enough negativity, it’s the Holiday Season! There’s hope for change since I’ve gotten over a 1000 positive comments on this Blog. Keep reading and commenting, please.
      Wishing you the best. Joyce
      Thank you very much for your support.

    1. Thanks so much for commenting on this archival Post. It took a lot of research and the problems mentioned are still occurring . New laws and regulations are required. Please share and continue commenting. All the best. Joyce

  1. It was hard for me to find your page in google. I found it on 17 position, you should build a lot of quality backlinks , it will help you to get more visitors.
    I know how to help you, just type in google – k2 seo tips

    1. Hi there:
      Thanks for the comment and your tip.
      I just wrote it down and will access it later.
      As much as I enjoy writing,the use of computer technology does not come naturally to me.
      I appreciate your help.
      Please continue to read and comment.
      All the best. Joyce

  2. I read a lot of interesting content here.
    Probably you spend a lot of time writing, i know how to save you a lot of work, there is an online tool that creates unique, google
    friendly articles in minutes, just type in google – laranitas free content

    1. Thanks for your suggestion, however, I’m not looking to save time and energy!
      Writing about topics that concern me is my passion!
      For those reinforcing and supporting me I’m glad you like my style.
      Continue reading and sharing and commenting.
      Hey you never know where our journey together will lead!
      All the best. Joyce

Leave a Reply